February 2015 – Mathematics

File: Trace of powers of a nilpotent matrix

This note, I copied from Yoshi on MathStackExchange:
\quad

Let ${A}$ be an ${n\times n}$ complex nilpotent matrix. Then we know that because all eigenvalues of ${A}$ must be 0, it follows that ${\text{tr}(A^n)=0}$ for all positive integers ${n}$ .

What I would like to show is the converse, that is, if ${\text{tr}(A^n)=0}$ for all positive integers ${n}$ , then ${A}$ is nilpotent. I tried to show that 0 must be an eigenvalue of ${A}$ , then try to show that all other eigenvalues must be equal to 0. However, I am stuck at the point where I need to show that ${\det(A)=0}$ .

May I know of the approach to show that ${A}$ is nilpotent?
\quad

The answer of Alvarez:

If the eigenvalues of ${A}$ are ${\lambda_1}$ , ${\dots}$ , ${\lambda_n}$ , then the eigenvalues of ${A^k}$ are ${\lambda_1^k}$ , ${\dots}$ , ${\lambda_n^k}$ . It follows that if all powers of ${A}$ have zero trace, then ${\lambda_1^k+\dots+\lambda_n^k=0, \forall k\geq 1}$ .

Using [Newton’s identities] to express the elementary symmetric functions of the ${\lambda_i}$ ‘s in terms of their power sums, we see that all the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of ${A}$ (except that of greatest degree, of course) are zero. This means that ${A}$ is nilpotent.
\quad
The answer of JBC:

Assume that for all ${k=1,\ldots,n}$ , ${\mathrm{tr}(A^k) = 0}$ where ${A}$ is a ${n\times n}$ matrix. We consider the eigenvalues in ${\mathbb{C}}$ .

Suppose ${A}$ is not nilpotent, so ${A}$ has some non-zero eigenvalues ${\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_r}$ .
Let ${n_i}$ the multiplicity of ${\lambda_i}$ then

$\displaystyle \left\{\begin{array}{ccc}n_1\lambda_1+\cdots+n_r\lambda_r&=&0 \\ \vdots & & \vdots \\ n_1\lambda_1^r+\cdots+n_r\lambda_r^r&=&0\end{array}\right.$

So we have

$\displaystyle \left(\begin{array}{cccc}\lambda_1&\lambda_2&\cdots&\lambda_r\\\lambda_1^2 & \lambda_2^2 & \cdots & \lambda_r^2 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ \lambda_1^r & \lambda_2^r & \cdots & \lambda_r^r\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}n_1 \\ n_2 \\ \vdots \\ n_r \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}0 \\ 0\\ \vdots \\ 0\end{array}\right)$

But

$\displaystyle \mathrm{det}\left(\begin{array}{cccc}\lambda_1&\lambda_2&\cdots&\lambda_r\\\lambda_1^2 & \lambda_2^2 & \cdots & \lambda_r^2 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ \lambda_1^r & \lambda_2^r & \cdots & \lambda_r^r\end{array}\right)=\lambda_1\cdots\lambda_r\,\mathrm{det}\left(\begin{array}{cccc} 1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\ \lambda_1&\lambda_2&\cdots&\lambda_r\\\lambda_1^2 & \lambda_2^2 & \cdots & \lambda_r^2 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\ \lambda_1^{r-1} & \lambda_2^{r-1} & \cdots & \lambda_r^{r-1}\end{array}\right)\neq 0$

(Vandermonde)

So the system has a unique solution which is ${n_1=\ldots=n_r=0}$ . Contradiction.
\quad
The answer of Qiaochu Yuan: Here is an argument that does not involve Newton’s identities, although it is still closely related to symmetric functions. Write

$\displaystyle f(z) = \sum_{k\ge 0} z^k \text{tr}(A^k) = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{1 - z \lambda_i}$

where ${\lambda_i}$ are the eigenvalues of ${A}$ . As a meromorphic function, ${f(z)}$ has poles at the reciprocals of all of the nonzero eigenvalues of ${A}$ . Hence if ${f(z) = n}$ identically, then there are no such nonzero eigenvalues.

The argument using Newton’s identities, however, proves the stronger statement that we only need to require ${\text{tr}(A^k) = 0}$ for ${1 \le k \le n}$ . Newton’s identities are in fact equivalent to the identity

$\displaystyle f(z) = n - \frac{z p'(z)}{p(z)}$

where ${p(z) = \prod_{i=1}^n (1 - z \lambda_i)}$ . To prove this identity it suffices to observe that

$\displaystyle \log p(z) = \sum_{i=1}^n \log (1 - z \lambda_i)$

and differentiating both sides gives

$\displaystyle \frac{p'(z)}{p(z)} = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{- \lambda_i}{1 - z \lambda_i}.$

(The argument using Newton’s identities is also valid over any field of characteristic zero.)

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Jan				Mar »
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28

Month: February 2015

Chúc mừng năm mới Ất Mùi

Một bổ đề về KerA và KerAA^t

Exercise of diff topo 1

Trace of powers of a nilpotent matrix